User talk:Scott Gall

PLEASE NOTE:

For the purposes of the One China policy, please refer to the People's Republic of China as China and the Republic of China as Taiwan.
British telephone numbers: London only has ONE area code - the code is 020, not 0207, 0208, or 0203. Same goes for all the other 02 codes - three-digit STD code, eight-digit number.
I DO NOT suck - if you want to be like Weird Al, click here.
Please do not get too poltical or religious in your posts.

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia from a neighbour (I live at St Clair, so you're not the only Dunedinite here!).

I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

By the way, you can use three tildes, like this: ~~~ to sign your name on talk and vote pages. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. [[User:Grutness|Grutness ^talk ]] 11:24, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

fill out a quick survey? +sj +

Okay, I've conducted a cursory search on "International dollar", and I can't find a single external reference to this anywhere, and there are none in the article itself. I suspect original research. Cites, please? --Calton 00:53, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

There were none, but the currency specifications matched that of the euro. Scott Gall 04:20, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hey scottie!! Jonny7070 (talk) 02:41, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of vandalism to European Union

Hey, no problem. I hate vandals just as much as the next guy, so I revert them when and where I see them. Incidentally, this particular vandal appears to either be associated with a weird guy called Sollog or is perhaps the crazy kook himself. For details take a look at the Slashdot article on Sollogs' edit war with Wikipedia. It's the first time I've reverted any of the stuff related to this particular dispute though. Impi 22:18, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Thank you for the links. They were interesting. Scott Gall 04:16, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Scott, you left a message for me about blanking pages. I wasn't blanking pages, I was merging a number of articles together. I think the larger article that was the target of the merge was "Decision model." 68.88.233.11 08:17, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Sorry about that. But you should have had an admin doing it. I can't trust anonymous users too much. Scott Gall 04:16, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

"The St. Clair Massive"?

Thanks - I think... :) Grutness|^hello? 13:05, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Hello Scott

Welcome back, I know this is a bit late and you have been active for a while but I missed that. It is good to see you back and good to see the interesting contributions you are making. Keep up the good work. ping 08:27, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC) P.S. how do you know when you really do have new messages?

It will display "You have new messages" twice. Scott Gall 04:13, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Free encyclopedia

If you want me to put the netherlands wikipedia on www.wikipedia.org in the 50,000 article category, please translate "The free encyclopedia" into dutch →Raul654 09:53, Jan 28, 2005 (UTC)

"The free encyclopedia" in Dutch is "De vrije encyclopedie." Scott Gall 04:10, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

GFDL

You can't just tag someone else's image you downloaded off the internet as being GFDL when it isn't. Image:Showimage.jpg has now been listed on Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. -- Cyrius|✎ 06:04, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Sorry about that. Scott Gall 04:08, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Missing leg syndrome

You really think cats have magical powers? Rick K 06:50, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
Yeah, I have to wonder what on earth you were thinking when you voted keep for the obvious vandalism article? Your pic above says "watch out vandals" and here you encouraged one. Poor form. DreamGuy 02:57, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)

Sorry about that. The article did have some elements of truth. I think vandals might be good for something (even if it's just reverting their own defacements of Wikipedia, which would be quite unlikely,) but I seriously doubt it. Scott Gall 04:02, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Gdansk

Your vote and comments seem to be a bit confused. 1793 was the year it was annexed by Prussia, a German speaking state. The change to "Gdansk" happened in 1945, after World War II. Voting to call it Danzig from 1466 to 1793, when it was a largely German-speaking city in Poland, and to call it Gdansk from 1793 to 1945, when it was a largely German-speaking city in Prussia and a largely German-speaking free city, doesn't make very much sense. john k 14:38, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Then my history teacher was a fraud. Scott Gall 04:22, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

It's a wiki

And please don't edit this page, because an administrator will be on you very quickly. All edits to this page which are not mine, except for the awarding of barnstars, are vandalism.

This is actually untrue. An edit may be made to a user page without being vandalism, for example, fixing a spelling mistake. As for getting administrators on a user who edits your user page while not vandalising it, I fail to see what they would be punished for doing, exactly. You can freely ask users not to edit your user page, but it's probably best not to threaten them. - Vague | Rant 11:06, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)

OK then. I'll fix it up. After all, that's the whole point of a wiki, isn't it? Scott Gall 20:42, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Vague has a good point. By definition:

"The malicious and intentional destruction or defacing of property." Google

Any edit consisting of a comment, critisism, suggesting, etc... fails to fall in that category. On another topic, I, as many others most likely, may find many of your statements disturbing. I agree everyone has the right to their opinion, but so many on the first impression? I'm sure you mean no harm by any of it, as it's how you view the world with your personal experiences.

Your potato comment: *Laugh* That's funny!
By the way, Jews, not blacks, were the major target of Hitler.
- So that's why Anne Frank was taken to a concentration camp, despite being a white. Scott Gall
Same language requirement: Talk about destruction of culture. There's conflict in your statements.
- I'm thinking about taking over my own country and using a constructed language (in this case, Esperanto) as official. Scott Gall
Circumcision: Touchy subject, considering I'm Jewish. I'll agree with you as far as to say it should NOT be done for cosmetic purposes. Circumcision is like cutting off an infants fingers due to "future under finger-nail dirt."
- I was going to make religious circumcision illegal but I won't now. I shouldn't be holding other peoples' religions against them. Scott Gall
Schools have not only the right to ban offensive things, but the responsibility to do so. School is for education, not "making a statement".
- Hence the stuff being banned anyway. Scott Gall
A good admin (person) follows rules. Disagreement does not justify breaking of a rule. The correct route is to campaign for it's change.
- Hence all the admins doing their own thing (and having everyone else do admins' work.) I still think admins should keep to their commitments to Wikipedia. :) Scott Gall 06:31, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
"My personal hate list [includes] The owners of competing wikis..." In a prior statement you said:

"13. I will have my own English-language wiki-based encyclopedia. And it will be better than Wikipedia ..."

I'll be surprised if this doesn't get deleted. Think: Constructive Criticism. I'm sorry you had to go through spinal meningitis, I did the same in fall of 1992 (at 23 years old). May an entity of your choosing, bless you in ways you desire.
:Guy M ^(talk) 18:30, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)

I've been thinking about which one to remove. Some of my Wikinfo subpages actually praise Wikinfo. Scott Gall 07:57, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Your User pages

Hi; I suggest you have a read through Wikipedia:User pages. As User:Vague Rant has indicated above, you come on too strong with your threats about people editing your User Page. I'd also encourage you to avoid making pages like User:Scott Gall/Gays are Wrong. This subpage is, of course, unrelated to writing an encyclopedia, but much more importantly, it would be very likely to offend others in the Wikipedia community — your page moves beyond personal opinion into hate speech, and I, for one, find it objectionable. I hope it's just a bad-taste joke. — Matt Crypto 18:30, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Oh dear. I'm off to fix that up. Scott Gall 20:45, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hiya. You really ought to clear up your user space a bit more. The servers are giving CPU time and storage space for an encyclopedia, not a collection of opinion pieces. Spend more time editing the article namespace. r3m0t ^talk 06:20, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

There's this place on Wikicities called Scratchpad. If more people comment on my overcrowded userspace, I'll consider moving my museum of vandalism over there. Scott Gall 09:17, 2005 Jun 6 (UTC) PS: You'd better keep an eye open, because I hear that some idiot pretending to be a university lecturer is getting all the New Zealand Wikipedians together for a huge vandalism bomb on Wikipedia Day, 2006. I definitely won't be doing that, and if I'm an admin by then, there will be a 36-hour block for anybody that I catch vandalising on Wikipedia Day (48 if they mess up my user space.)

Hi

Hi Scott, I read on your user page about the AS. If you ever need help dealing with the NTs, feel free to ask me, because I'd be glad to help out if I can. ;-) Best, SlimVirgin 04:43, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)

Adminship

Hi. Your Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Scott Gall seems not to go through this time. Just as a note, you can retract your self nomination anytime, e.g. if the chances of passing are slim and you don't feel good about accumulating too many rejections. Personally I think that you have not yet enough experience on Wikipedia, and you should try again later when you have more experience/edits. Also, thanks for changing the you have new messages note on your page, which confused me every time i saw it. Happy editing, -- Chris 73 Talk 12:55, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)

W. N. Colquitt

Nice article ;) Glad to see my clarification got the proverbial ball rolling over there, at least.—chris.lawson (talk) 05:41, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

"I found your edit summary offensive"; "Please don't use the Lord's name in vain"

Wow, okay. I'll watch what I say, but frankly, if language like this offends you, then I hope for the sake of your virgin eyes you stay as far away from Wikipedia as possible; I hear rumors that "fuck", "shit", "Christ" and other similarly colorful expressions pepper the pages of this encyclopedia almost as pervasively as do factual errors and misinformation. 69.203.80.227 11:22, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Is that right? Scott Gall 11:24, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

God's honest truth. 69.203.80.227 11:35, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I just nominated you for adminship. If you accept, tell me here. Cheers, NazismIsntCool 10:53, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I got 2 replies on my talk page saying that I should wait until I have more edits in the article namespace before nominating you. I hear you failed one a month ago, and thank you for taking action to what some of the people said in their votes. Cheers, NazismIsntCool 21:41, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC) PS: Did you enjoy our practice edit war on Postman Pat? I pulled out because I was worried one of us might have breached WP:3RR.

Hi, I'm new here. I take it you already know my sister, User:NazismIsntCool. I was also born in Romania but I live in London now. Barely There 03:59, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

r00t

1 \/\/4n7 t0 |\|o/\/\|n473 j00 2 b|<u/\/\ a r00t. j00 h4ve 24 |-|r5 2 r3|ºly. Nazism isn't cool 11:12, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC) |º5: ph33r /\/\y 1337 sk1llz!

I take it you want to have another try at nominating me for adminship. Go ahead if you want, but please do not use leet on my talk page. There is a policy statement at the top, if you missed it. Scott Gall 11:25, 2005 Jun 5 (UTC)

Imi pare rău. I just wanted to show off my leet skills. I didn't see the policy - I've lost half of my peripheral vision and the doctors haven't figured out what's wrong with my eyes yet. At least I'm not completely blind. :-) Nazism isn't cool 11:31, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC) PS: Thanks for replying.

I think it's called retinitis pigmentosa. I've read about it somewhere. I accept the nomination for adminship. Scott Gall 11:43, 2005 Jun 5 (UTC)

Wikipedia is...

Scott, why do you think the next person who dares to do this type of vandalism will add the autism awareness ribbon and "Wikipedia is Autism" to the same pages the communism and fascism vandals have been going after? Barely There 10:01, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hi there.

Hey, nice museum of vandalism you've got. Communism is Stupid 9 July 2005 13:42 (UTC) PS: I'm NazismIsntCool's mother. I take it you already know her.

RfA#Redwolf24

Hello, I would like to thank you for casting a vote at my RfA. Even though it wasn't support I'd like to thank you for taking time and voting anyway. With respect, Redwolf24 07:49, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Dorricott

Who is this and why isn't it a vanity page. BTW, you created it. Mrmcgibby 00:29, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Browse around this site. You'll find the answer. Scott Gall 04:16, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

hi

can you please help me with my Lisa Kushell article thanks@!!!Wiki brah 05:15, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hongi Hika

Hi, just chucked an article on the Hongi Hika stub you started - just letting you know in case you wanted to check it/be rude et C. feel free to change anything you don't like. Also in passing I notice your anti advertising stance - good on ya - I'm not too up on how Wikipedia works, but you may want to check out the New Zealand Natural page, which has more than a wiff of corporate self promotion. Cheers, Winston Wolfe.

Üserbøxen

The møøse wishes you welcome, and encourages you to utilize the red links on the Non ISO languages page to make lots and lots of userboxes called "yasm-x" (where YaSm stands for...well...you can guess, because I can't spell, and x stands for 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and n). One day I might get around to making a "Welcome to Üserbøxen" template or something, but for now...welcome to Üserbøxen. (Though I see you've been dipping into the pot of many userboxes already, which is blatantly encouraged.) Cernen 08:58, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have heard the term 'Home Nations'.

Scott, I have heard the term 'Home Nations' used in association with the recent Grand Slam rugby tour by the All Blacks to the British Isles.I have not heard it used anywhere else. - (Aidan Work 08:40, 30 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

I had heard it a few times, especially during the Grand Slam tour, the most recent of which we won. Don't get your hopes up about next year because although we've only beaten all four Home Nations twice (the other one being in 1978,) there's a good chance we could do it a third time. Scott Gall 09:21, 31 December 2005 (UTC) PS: I've noticed a strange pattern - New Zealand only gets the Grand Slam in the same year as a Papal conclave, and the last four conclaves have all happened in the same year as a general election.[reply]

Hello

Hi there, I was going to fix up some spelling, but I decided against it as I'd of been tempted to help out with your user boxes too. You seems to have a few that contradict each other which is odd to say the least, and at least a couple repeat, do you want them repetition removed ? I saw you were diagnosed with AS, I was too, but not until I had left a few schools in my late teens, unfortunately. I am currently studying in Wanaka, New Zealand and was wondering if you wanted to talk some time. Also, should I fix the user boxes that repeat, what about the contradictions ? samh004 05:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Auckland meetup

Just to let you know that a meetup is planned in Auckland for the 25th of June (see Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland for more details), and that you are cordially invited. GeorgeStepanek\^talk 00:21, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:A$2_dollar_note_back.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:A$2_dollar_note_back.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:11, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

As an AIW member please review Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of relationships with age disparity and please take a side. Help recruit others to review the list.

Punani

Looks like vandalism, smells like... (uh, nevermind). Could you take a look at the latest contribution to the disambiguation page for Punani? It seems like you originated the article Punani (slang) and so might be the best to judge. Thanks. Shenme 20:17, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Punani

Looks like vandalism, smells like... (uh, nevermind). Could you take a look at the latest contribution to the disambiguation page for Punani? It seems like you originated the article Punani (slang) and so might be the best to judge. Thanks. Shenme 20:20, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Punani is not a tea made from the natural juices secreted from the vagina of a virgin. I've never heard of such a ridiculous thing. Scott Gall 04:57, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ka Panapana

Hi Scott - The reference to Ka Panapana has now been shifted out of Haka to the article Haka in popular culture so I have shifted your question to the talk page of that article. Cheers Kahuroa 06:06, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Scott Gall/Revenge Made Easy

I removed the category from your subpage. It's not really appropriate for user pages to be article categories. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 08:47, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the page? If so, did you like any of the pranks mentioned? Scott Gall 09:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep I read them and it reminded me of one we used to do. When we had the Honey bucket system we also had a thick plastic bag inside the pail. The trick was to put the bag (tied) into a pillow case and then onto the bed. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 21:56, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ladder of Certain Doom

I have removed the page a WP:OFFICE act because we were notified of copyright infringement. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Dannyisme 14:41, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

m:wikikids

I saw that you were involved in the wikikids project, (months ago that's true...) What happened with this project since that time ? Did people gave up for lack of people showing interest in it ? Or did it gave something ? I can see now on meta proposal for simple german, french or spanish, and think that wikikids would be better and meet some of these objectives. It has been change a bit and I hope that it will arise once, so would you have a look there ? I hope that you can give your point of view. Thanks ! Astirmays 18:16, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keratoconus

To answer your question placed on Image talk:Keratoconus1-800.jpg, yes the cornea can take on a cone shape, though it's hardly ever visible to anyone else without a close inspection. The disease is explained in the accompanying article, Keratoconus. Regards, — BillC^talk 13:00, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moonies...

I happened on your page somehow and saw the massive mooninite image, and made this...

This user supports freeing Ignignokt from Gitmo.

User:DennyColt/MoonBox

Just wanted to share and give you credit for the inspiration. thanks - Denny 14:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Color photography

Hi there. In case you don't have the page watchlisted, I've replied to you and User:Cravenmonket's discussion here. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 15:28, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

is it okay

i added something to your steve irwin memorial is that okay63.164.225.201 20:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)medayugiohman[reply]

Of course it is. That's what a wiki is all about. 1001001001111100000 13:15, 14 April 2007 (UTC) PS: As long as it's not vandalism.[reply]

Indefinite blocking

Hello, Scott. I've looked over your past and present contributions and have decided to indefinitely block you. You've been warned previous times about your behavior and haven't done much to change your ways. I'm sorry this didn't work out for you. 1ne 05:24, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Showimage.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Showimage.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Millennium tenner.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Millennium tenner.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Potato (word)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Potato (word). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Potato (word). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:31, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Scott Gall! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 12 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Ian Dorricott - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
W. N. Colquitt - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:18, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bare-chested

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bare-chested requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 06:52, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	great poem titled good admin 2005 Delux.delux (talk) 13:48, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bats (musical) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bats (musical) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bats (musical) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 20:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]